Originally Posted by pindi_express
If you are going by that theory then why no complaining about Asif getting 2 years and Butt getting 7? This was Butt's first controversy as well.
Well you got a point aswell. Maybe I am not that concerned about butt
but then again this is indain news article they will want to produce as much propaganda as much possible...because these kinds of news articles are to influence the hearing decisions (imho). (and given the imaturity and unprofessionalism of indian journalism throughout the years)
let suppose for the arguments sake...that it is ""true""
. Then Indian media should have shown at least an ounce of professionalism and not print anything relating to the results of the hearing unless they are hell bent on influencing it. Not a professional stance.
And also lets suppose it is ""true"" for the sake of another argument
. Then i would say that the ICC is bent on punishing anyone who would show some guts and speak about ICC in public,....like butt is doing...SO ICC is just taking their revenge out on butt in the form of a ridiculously bigger ban.
But then Again I only care about amir. Becasue out of the three Amior has been the biggest loss to us.
So i think we should cut our losses and leave with what we have got left rather than losing everything.