Even before he had made his international appearance, Umar Akmal had the air of an accomplished cricket hero. He walked with a strut, stiffened his chest when shaking hands, and had this way of looking past you as he talked. If you didn't know better, you might assume he had won the World Cup for his country or made a double-hundred in Australia.

Although his initial performances seemed to justify this conceit, there is a growing sense that Akmal is squandering his talent. His Test average, sitting pretty at 55.50 after five matches, has trailed off to 35.82 after 16, getting him axed from the Test squad. And while his ODI and T20 numbers have held up more strongly, a habit of throwing his wicket away suggests he can do so much better.

His fluent innings of 91 in the second ODI of the recent series against Sri Lanka is emblematic of his temperament. There he was, unbeaten on 79, playing a steady hand, with Pakistan needing another 86 from 76 balls. An unbroken sixth-wicket stand was prospering with Sarfraz Ahmed. On the next three deliveries, Akmal stroked three brilliant boundaries, then sent a catch straight down the throat of mid-on. The chase faltered, and Pakistan lost.

After his dismissal Akmal refused to remove his pads, and struck a distraught pose, sitting on the pavilion steps. When TV cameras brought him into view, his eyes darted self-consciously between the camera and the stadium screen. In its own way it was a fine example of grandstanding. Umar comes from a family of seven brothers, two of whom, Kamran and Adnan, are also playing for Pakistan. They grew up in an area that is as quintessentially Lahore as Lahore can get. Grandstanding is something Akmal probably knows a thing or two about.

Had he kept his cool, Pakistan's scoreline in this series would almost certainly have read 5-0 instead of 4-1. He made amends with a match-winning 61 not out in the final ODI, but it just underscored what he is capable of. As a batsman he is technically complete, possessing the skill to play orthodox and unorthodox shots all around the wicket with equal flair and command. Seasoned observers have even compared him to a young Javed Miandad, but there is an irksome flamboyance about him that seems to be getting in the way of him realising his true potential.

Suspicions that he might have feigned injury once or twice haven't helped his reputation. Most famously this happened after last year's Sydney Test between Australia and Pakistan, when Kamran Akmal's disastrous wicketkeeping got him the chop. Almost on cue, Umar opted out of the next game, complaining of a side strain. He did eventually play, after being talked out of what many felt was a mistaken show of solidarity with his brother.

At times he seems quite an enigma, making it difficult to get inside his head. A particularly puzzling example is his batting on the final day of the ill-fated Lord's Test between England and Pakistan last year. The spot-fixing news had exploded, and the air was thick with controversy and stigma. Pakistan, following on after collapsing for 74 in the first innings, were going through the last rites in an atmosphere that was overwhelmingly funereal. In these dying spasms, when no one could focus on cricket and wickets fell steadily at the other end, Akmal chose to smash an unbeaten 79 from 68 balls, with 11 fours and two sixes. Was it a show of defiance, an opportunity to make some quick runs, or an attempt to save face for his team? He certainly kept people guessing.

Beneath this exasperating exterior is a rich core of talent and ambition, and every now and then it expresses itself to the delight of fans and critics alike. There are, for example, his eight Man-of-the-Match awards, some of which came from efforts that left a mark - the careful 44 not out against Australia in the 2011 World Cup, made after the top order was gone; the tenacious fifty against South Africa in last year's World Twenty20; the unbeaten 102 from 72 balls against Sri Lanka in Colombo in 2009, in only his third ODI. And although he has yet to win a match award in Test cricket, he did mark his Test debut, two years ago in Dunedin, with an attractive 129 and 75.

Pakistani fans are still looking for an heir to their august batting lineage, which starts with Hanif Mohammad, consolidates through Zaheer Abbas, Javed Miandad, and Inzamam-ul-Haq, and continues in the current era with Mohammad Yousuf and Younis Khan. Umar Akmal has all the talent to be next in line, but so far he has shown little evidence that he grasps the art of accumulating runs or possesses the psychological secrets of longevity at the crease. He must understand that true batting greatness is not a matter of destiny but of discipline, diligence, desire, and dedication. Far more is required than just flashy shots and the occasional match-winning fifty.

http://www.espncricinfo.com/magazine...ry/542281.html

__________________
Shit happens, and then you die!!!

oh common..i cant read an essay of 2000 words about him...he is talented..and needs to have more patient...full stop.

ridiculous article - just to say what you said in 1 statement.

I may be wrong but I think he slightly lacks that kind of concentration and a very strong focus on his game as Dravid or Tendulkar has. Umar can surely improve it.
It looks like he is sorta prone to indulge into team politics with a slight push.

And this word 'Talent' is perhaps the most over rated word in Pak cricket. Talent is useless without the support of hardwork , focus and a functioning brain. Talent can also backfire, and it usually does in Pak players cases, where the player goes into the mental mode of 'I am talented so I am automatically in the top tier, no need to anything more.'
There was one guy that really had talent, it was no other than Wasim Akram. He also had the support of hardwork and not a very bad functioning brain but he slightly lacked in focus, and hence got involved into some bitter controversies during his career. Looks like its just a part of some of Pak players' mindsets.

I yearn for someone with the sheer focus of Rahul Dravid in Pak time. Almost 20 years of non-stop cricket and hardly any controversy, team politics, sentimental press statements, issues with board or team members, I mean it's truly amazing how nicely he went thru two decades.
Umar Akmal is young and needs A LOT of maturity to make the right choices. There will be quite frequent occasions where he will be tested. I hope he primarily focuses on his game and wish him all the best.

like buck fush said he has all the talent, but its of no use if you dont work hard and focus

hes a very good player, he has performed decently in recent series and i am sure if given more time he will keep improving

after all the posts you have made praising afridis antics over the years, its very hard to take you seriously when you say you yearn for a rahul dravid to come out of pakistan who plays cricket for 20 years with no controversies.

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

System make it even harder for players to play with that kind of focus. The way YK is playing his cricket today, had he played that way all along he would've been the closest version of Rahul Dravid. But again politics & system constantly pressurize the player, and then I also see that the love for the game isn't the same.

__________________
kya bood-o-bash poocho ho purab ke sakino! hum ko gareeb jan ke, hans hans pukar ke...
jis ko falak ne loot ke veeran kar diya, hum rehne walay hain usi ujray dyar ke -

lol @ taking me seriously, as if u had a couple of dozen Rahul Dravids in your pocket and u were ready to shower them on Pak team if a serious concern was raised in your majesty's court.

Sir ji, maaf kardayn ghalti hoagie ! ,,,, as she may know "maaf karsho".

the point is that nobody here worships afridi like you do and supports and defends every rebellious action he's ever taken. so for you to now come out and say "oh actually, we need someone like dravid" who is 100% the opposite of afridi is a bit rich. kind of like zardari saying "we need stricter laws on corruption!" or mirza sahab saying "i love urdu speaking people, my relatives are married to them!"

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

lol @ defending his rebellious actions.

Pull out my posts when he went cornivorous on the cricket ball and see what I wrote then. Look at my recent posts when I called him 'bits n pieces' player AND/OR a Captain.

It's amazing that u put Dravid and Afridi in the same breadth. A team will be a disaster if it had all eleven Dravids OR all eleven Afridis. They both bring a totally different skill and ability to the team.

And if you call him rebellious for what he did and paid fine for it in a successful effort to clean up the trash in PCB then perhaps u r one the most unthankful and unfaithful Pak cricket fan. You deserve to work under the attendings and a program director who run the show exactly as Ijaz Butt did in PCB.

I think akmal should be in test its useless to ask him to built his temperament in ODI, we need someone to bat with some fire in middle order

__________________
My Blog: http://www.sohnidhurti.com

'Maaaf Karshoo' but perhaps he will get one. who knows.

__________________
kya bood-o-bash poocho ho purab ke sakino! hum ko gareeb jan ke, hans hans pukar ke...
jis ko falak ne loot ke veeran kar diya, hum rehne walay hain usi ujray dyar ke -

If Umar Akmal is a riddle then what is Kamran Akmal?

Jaab taak Time aee ga PAISA Khila deya jaee ga "Fikar not Zikar Not"

8 year older than riddle?

__________________
kya bood-o-bash poocho ho purab ke sakino! hum ko gareeb jan ke, hans hans pukar ke...
jis ko falak ne loot ke veeran kar diya, hum rehne walay hain usi ujray dyar ke -